Three Keys to Valuation for Litigation and Dispute Resolution

Expertise

SP&H is a choice provider of business valuations, lost profit calculations, and economic damage analyses for litigation and dispute resolution. We have proven methodology combines theory with common sense to derive results that can withstand stringent third-party scrutiny.

SP&H’s extensive research and creativity produce unparalleled results. Our seasoned professionals have performed over 4,000 valuations, at any time we have about 200 active matters, have been named as expert witnesses in over 1,000 court proceedings, and possess the most regarded valuation credentials. Our clients generally include privately held companies with revenues of every size, and have included Fortune 500 companies and Forbes 400 members.

Review of experts’ reports, case files, and depositions; preparation of counsel for defending the deposition of their expert; preparation of deposition questions for counsel for the opposing expert; assist counsel in preparing arguments for and identifying potential Motions in Limine; and writing memoranda of case issues for trial and Motions in Limine.

Experience

Litigation Support Helps Eliminate Damage Claim 

Working in tandem with SP&H, legal counsel was effective in persuading the Court during Motions in Limine that the defendant's expert witness report for business damages should not be admitted due to: (1) the defendant would have received a "double-recovery" because the recovery would have overlapped with compensation the defendant was otherwise claiming; and (2) the defendant did not meet the statutory requirement proving that the damages were caused by the actions of the plaintiff.

Excellence

The quality of our work is best expressed by the words of our clients...

"The demonstrative exhibits which Sanli Pastore & Hill, Inc., prepared were easy to understand and clearly supported your testimony and opinions. As always, the level of professionalism, which you exhibited on the witness stand, in this case was unmatched. Thanks again for a job well done." -- Mr. Springer, Attorney at Law

"Your presentation was so intimidating that there was no substantive cross-examination on your opinions." -- Mr. Thorsnes, Attorney at Law